<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Beginning Farmers &#187; Policy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.beginningfarmers.org/policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org</link> <description>Practical Tools for Successful Family Farming</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:17:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Sustainable Agriculture News January 16-20, 2012</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-january-16-20/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-january-16-20/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:27:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation Programs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[January]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sustainable Agriculture]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=15253</guid> <description><![CDATA[Latest news from the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition for the week of January 16-20th 2012: USDA NEWS USDA Taking Applications for Rural and Farm Energy Funding: On January 20, USDA announced that it is taking applications for Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) funding. For FY2012, USDA has $25.4 million in budget authority for REAP, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #800000;">Latest <em><strong>news</strong></em> from the</span> <a
href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">National <em><strong>Sustainable Agriculture</strong></em> Coalition</a> <span
style="color: #800000;">for the week of <em><strong>January 16-20th 2012</strong></em>:</span></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">USDA NEWS</span></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=N9wmtoFTOq2kpf2387HNdmRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">USDA Taking Applications for Rural and Farm Energy Funding</a>: On January 20, USDA <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=itkSQ%2FpNlBC18djNCydcYmRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">announced</a> that it is taking applications for <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=SCfNWQ8YeB2%2FPcnmN%2BqjOmRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Rural Energy for America Program</a> (REAP) funding. For FY2012, USDA has $25.4 million in budget authority for REAP, which will support at least $12.5 million in grant funding and approximately $48.5 million in loan guarantees. <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=8hW8HZ0rc8SVVjM42WyIQ2RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=GLzNHEjrib0Orqn1s2VLj2RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Funding Available for Organic Research</a>: On Tuesday, January 17th, 2012, USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture announced the release of its 2012 Request for Applications (RFA) for the <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=iufwE%2Flw%2BTsdxhLkN%2FEqlWRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative</a> (OREI), which provides grants to academic, private, and non-profit research institutions to investigate research issues related to organic production.  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=m%2BWQZ5QgdK22Xf7SeYObr2RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Applications</a> are due on March 9th, 2012, and approximately $19 million is available.  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=6IzEArA8ZTDeMyFtVyX1OWRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Iwye%2FI9O7LFpaCiExnpZY2RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">USDA Announces CIG Funding for Water Quality Markets</a>: On Friday, January 13, <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=nSoQ%2Bz1bya10MI9WO3YuBWRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">USDA announced</a> the availability of $10 million for water quality credit trading projects through the <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=YBRtxM5g%2FforFkH4gVK6PWRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Conservation Innovation Grants</a> (CIG) program. According to USDA’s vision of water quality credit trading, “a producer who implements conservation practices to reduce water quality pollutants can also benefit by generating water quality market credits that could be sold in an open market, which would reduce the costs of implementing and maintaining the conservation practices.”  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=jFKVy80iXh12R6O2rUzDQ2RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">OTHER NEWS</span></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Gh3ttHjBvopp%2FtRgb546XmRtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">New Regulatory Certainty Program Announced in Minnesota</a>: On Tuesday, January 17, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, and USDA’s Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service Dave White met in Minnesota to announce a new partnership between the State, USDA, and EPA.  Through the partnership, producers would receive immunity, also known as regulatory assurance or certainty, from regulation under Minnesota’s water quality standards in exchange for the implementation of certain conservation activities.  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=ZIKaUCh6UtdXuS2L1xWd92RtXo1mzn%2B1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-january-16-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Beginning Farmer Financing and Loan Rules Update</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/beginning-farmer-financing-loan-rules-update/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/beginning-farmer-financing-loan-rules-update/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Farming Resources]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Beginning Farmer Financing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[loan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rules]]></category> <category><![CDATA[updated]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=15242</guid> <description><![CDATA[This beginning farmer financing and loan rules update from USDA includes the announcement of SIGNIFICANT CHANGES in LOAN ELIGIBILITY RULES for beginning farmers and a new Program that encourages landowners to sell their land to beginning farmers using land contracts (seller-based financing). Beginning Farmers applauds these significant changes which will help to remove existing barriers [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">This</span><em><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> beginning farmer financing and loan rules update </strong></span></em><span
style="color: #ff0000;">from USDA includes the announcement of</span> <span
style="color: #800000;">SIGNIFICANT CHANGES in <em><strong>LOAN</strong></em> ELIGIBILITY <em><strong>RULES</strong></em></span> <span
style="color: #800000;">for <em><strong>beginning farmers</strong></em></span><span
style="color: #ff0000;"> and a new Program that encourages landowners to sell their land to beginning farmers using land contracts</span> <span
style="color: #ff0000;">(seller-based financing).</span> <span
style="color: #800000;">Beginning Farmers applauds these significant changes which will help to remove existing barriers that limit the ability of new farmers to participate in federal loan programs, and offer new opportunities for transferring land from private owners to beginning farmers! </span></p><p><span
style="color: #800000;">USDA Announces Greater Flexibility and Additional Tools for Beginning Farmers and Ranchers</span><br
/> WASHINGTON, Jan. 20, 2012 — U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) Administrator Bruce Nelson today announced today a new rule that expands loan opportunities for beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, while also establishing a new Land Contract Guarantee Program. The rule provides additional flexibility <span
style="color: #ff0000;">allowing FSA loan officers to consider all prior farming experience, including on-the-job training and formal education, when determining eligibility for FSA for farm operating and ownership loans</span>. It also expands a previous pilot program, the <span
style="color: #ff0000;">Land Contract Guarantee Program, from six states to all 50 states. This program is designed to encourage farmers and ranchers to sell their property to beginning and socially disadvantaged (SDA) farmers and ranchers through the use of seller financing</span>.<br
/> “USDA continues to find ways to improve our services for farmers and ranchers by streamlining processes, accelerating delivery, and using innovative solutions to 21st century agricultural challenges,” said Nelson. “These improvements demonstrate FSA’s commitment to helping the next generation of America’s farmers and ranchers participate in our nation’s agricultural economy. The new flexibility also enlarges the pool of potential farmland buyers, which is important to young, beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers who start out or operate without established credit.”<br
/> <span
style="color: #ff0000;">The changes in eligibility announced today will increase access for farmers and ranchers to FSA loans and credit assistance. The new rule enables landowners to sell their farmland to the next generation on a contract for deed with a 90-percent guarantee against losses to the seller. Alternatively, the agency can provide a guarantee of three years’ amortized loan installments, plus payment of real estate taxes and hazard insurance premiums for the same three-year period.</span><span
id="more-15242"></span><br
/> U.S. agriculture is currently experiencing its most productive period in decades thanks to the productivity, resiliency, and resourcefulness of America’s producers. The improvements outlined today will help producers and businesses maintain this competitive edge. In late 2011, FSA announced a series of additional process improvements that included quicker disaster assistance and less reporting dates. Details follow:<br
/> USDA is reviewing comments on a proposed rule to streamline the process for its Secretarial Disaster Designation, allowing farmers and ranchers devastated by natural disasters to obtain emergency loans and other assistance faster than before. Streamlining the process from six steps to two will enable USDA to help those in need in an expedited manner. Additionally, the proposed rule can help to ensure all eligible disaster counties receive a designation.<br
/> USDA established 15 common Acreage Reporting Dates (ARDs) for farmers and ranchers participating in FSA and Risk Management Agency (RMA) programs. The common reporting dates will reduce the reporting burden on producers and also help to reduce USDA operating costs by sharing similar data across participating agencies. Before the streamlining, RMA had 54 ARDs for 122 crops, and FSA had 17 ARDs for 273 crops.<br
/> <span
style="color: #ff0000;">More information on the new Land Contract Guarantee Program and the other changes are available at local FSA offices nationwide. Information about Farm Loan Programs and FSA loan qualifications can be found at</span> <a
href="http://www.fsa.usda.gov" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.fsa.usda.gov</a>.<br
/> The Obama Administration, with Agriculture Secretary Vilsack’s leadership, has worked tirelessly to strengthen rural America, implement the Farm Bill, maintain a strong farm safety net, and create opportunities for America’s farmers and ranchers. U.S. agriculture is currently experiencing one of its best years in decades thanks to the productivity, resiliency, and resourcefulness of our producers. Today, net farm income is at record levels while debt has been cut in half since the 1980s. Overall, American agriculture supports 1 in 12 jobs in the United States and provides American consumers with 86 percent of the food we consume, while maintaining affordability and choice. The Obama Administration has aggressively worked to expand export opportunities and reduce barriers to trade, helping to push agricultural exports to record levels in 2011 and beyond. Strong agricultural exports are a positive contribution to the U.S. trade balance, support nearly 1 million American jobs and boost economic growth.<br
/> USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice), or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/beginning-farmer-financing-loan-rules-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Young Farm Policy Leaders Provide Strategies for Communicating with Congress</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/young-farm-policy-leaders-provide-strategies-for-communicating-with-congress/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/young-farm-policy-leaders-provide-strategies-for-communicating-with-congress/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:40:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Young Farmers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[young leaders]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=13605</guid> <description><![CDATA[Young Farm Policy Leaders Provide Strategies for Communicating with Congress at Fresh Impact Panel Under-35 Panel Highlights Advocacy &#38; Grassroots Seminar at October’s Washington Public Policy Conference WASHINGTON, D.C. – Four of the leading young minds in federal agriculture policy will provide an inside look at how produce industry members can communicate more effectively with [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
align="center"><span
style="color: #800000;"><em><strong>Young Farm Policy Leaders Provide Strategies for Communicating with Congress</strong></em> at Fresh Impact Panel</span></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">Under-35 Panel Highlights Advocacy &amp; Grassroots Seminar at October’s Washington Public Policy Conference</span></p><p>WASHINGTON, D.C. – Four of the leading young minds in federal agriculture policy will provide an inside look at how produce industry members can communicate more effectively with their elected officials at the United Fresh Produce Association’s Washington Public Policy Conference, October 3-5 in Washington, D.C.</p><p>On Monday afternoon, October 3, the Fresh Impact Panel at United’s Advocacy &amp; Grassroots seminar features four leaders—all under the age of 35—at the forefront of agricultural policy in Washington. USDA’s Anne Cannon MacMillan, Matt Perin of the House Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture, Russell &amp; Barron’s Tyson Redpath, and Jacqlyn Schneider of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry will join United Fresh members for a fresh and unconventional look at the process of connecting with members of Congress and conveying produce industry priorities.</p><p>“These four leaders represent the new guard and next generation of policy rainmakers in Washington and, even with their youth, they have a seasoned ability to artfully communicate complex agricultural policy issues up the chain to the highest levels of government,” said United Fresh Senior Vice President of Public Policy Robert Guenther. “Our members will benefit tremendously as Anne, Matt, Tyson and Jacqlyn sit down to share their fresh take on how best to approach and work with lawmakers with the goal of getting real results and building industry success.”<span
id="more-13605"></span></p><p>MacMillan serves as a senior advisor to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, assisting the secretary in developing and implementing policy priorities in the areas of nutrition, specialty crops, food safety, livestock markets and animal health.  Prior to joining USDA, MacMillan was the senior policy advisor to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and legislative director for Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.)</p><p>Before joining the House Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture as staff director, Perin served on the personal office staff of Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio), and managed the successful reelection campaign of Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) in 2004.</p><p>Now senior vice president, Redpath joined Russell &amp; Barron after twice serving on the legislative staff of Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio). Prior to joining Speaker Boehner’s office, Redpath directed state delegation outreach operations at the 2004 Republican National Convention, and specialized in issues concerning food safety, child nutrition and generic drug applications for the law firm of Olsson, Frank and Weeda.</p><p>Schneider serves as senior professional staff on the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, where she manages specialty crops, organics, FDA food safety and nutrition issues for Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.). Prior to joining the committee, Schneider was legislative director for Rep. Jim Costa (D-Calif.) handling legislative issues including healthcare, trade, education and immigration. Before serving in Rep. Costa’s office, she worked in government relations for a biotech trade association.</p><p>“With the fresh, youthful insight of these four policy pros, our members will come away from this year’s Advocacy &amp; Grassroots Seminar with real, tangible strategies and tools for connecting with their elected officials,” added Guenther.</p><p>The Fresh Impact Panel and Advocacy &amp; Grassroots Seminar add to a busy schedule of events for the annual Washington Public Policy Conference, including the Wednesday keynote address from House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), discussions with federal regulators at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration, market segment-specific education sessions and the popular Fresh Festival on Capitol Hill. Additionally, this year’s event includes the most visits to congressional offices by conference attendees in the event’s history.</p><p><em>Ed. Note: Press registration for the Washington Public Policy Conference is complimentary and may be arranged by contacting United Fresh Communications Manager Patrick Delaney at 202-303-3400, ext. 417, or <a
href="mailto:pdelaney@unitedfresh.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">pdelaney@unitedfresh.org</a>.</em></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/young-farm-policy-leaders-provide-strategies-for-communicating-with-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Farm Policy 2012 Style – Serving the Public Interest or Misdirection</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-policy-2012-style-%e2%80%93-serving-the-public-interest-or-misdirection/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-policy-2012-style-%e2%80%93-serving-the-public-interest-or-misdirection/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=13602</guid> <description><![CDATA[ RURAL LIFE DAY 2011: Farm Policy 2012 Style – Serving the Public Interest or Misdirection Saturday, December 3, 2011; Alphonse J. Schwartze Catholic Center &#8211; 2207 West Main, Jefferson City, Missouri; 8:30 AM to 3:40 PM State and national leaders in the local and healthy foods, family farm, and sustainability movements will join us on [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
align="center"> RURAL LIFE DAY 2011:<strong> <em>Farm Policy 2012 Style – Serving the Public Interest or Misdirection</em></strong></p><p
align="center"><span
style="color: #ff0000;">Saturday, December 3, 2011; Alphonse J. Schwartze Catholic Center &#8211; 2207 West Main, Jefferson City, Missouri; 8:30 AM to 3:40 PM</span></p><p>State and national leaders in the local and healthy foods, family farm, and sustainability movements will join us on Dec. 3 for the 2011 Rural Life Day. With them we will examine the misdirection, restrictions, and opportunities contained in what is perhaps the centerpiece of global food and agriculture policy – the <strong>US</strong> <strong><em>Farm Bill.</em></strong></p><p>We will have the opportunity to hear and interact with the lived experiences of farmers and those that research and document the lives of family farm and food producers in the US.  And, we will endeavor to pull together the experiences and research with a faith that calls us to wholeness and place it into a vision and a quest for a better way to live on our fragile, abundant and fruitful, yet increasingly endangered Earth.<strong><em><span
id="more-13602"></span></em></strong></p><p>·      With Dr. John Ikerd we will experience the passion of a researched and reasoned academic’s call to ecological sustainability and the kind of public policy that would support it.</p><p>·      With Melinda Hemmelgarn (and assistance from Dan Hemmelgarn) we will be witnesses to a dynamic photographic storytelling of the American food and agricultural landscape.</p><p>·      With Richard Oswald we will hear in prose and poetry the authentic life and work of a fifth-generation American farmer.</p><p>·      And, with Brother David Andrews, we will hear and discuss the moral vision and practical applications that are essential to holistic and holy farm, food and environmental policy that would preserve, protect, and enrich the fundamental elements and resources of our Earth &#8211; for us and our children’s children.</p><p>PLAN TO JOIN US –</p><p>Registration &#8211; $30 per person  (pre-payment required for pre-registration)</p><p>Checks payable to – Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri (note for Rural Life Day)</p><p>Send to CCCNMO</p><p>P O Box 104626, Jefferson City, Missouri 65110</p><p>For more information contact-</p><p>Barbara Ross</p><p>Director of Social Services</p><p>Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri</p><p>P O Box 104626</p><p>Jefferson City, M0 65110</p><p>573.635.9127 x225</p><p><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="mailto:bross@cccnmo.org" target="_blank">bross@cccnmo.org</a></strong></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-policy-2012-style-%e2%80%93-serving-the-public-interest-or-misdirection/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Sustainable Agriculture News Update, August 2011</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-update-august-2011/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-update-august-2011/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sustainable Agriculture]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation Innovation Grants]]></category> <category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vilsack]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=13230</guid> <description><![CDATA[USDA NEWS from the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition – August 29, 2011 New ERS Conservation Articles and Report On Monday, August 22, USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) issued a new edition of its Amber Waves magazine, featuring two important agricultural conservation stories. “Reducing Agriculture’s Nitrogen Footprint: Are New Policy Approaches Needed?” is a helpful quick review [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>USDA NEWS from the National</strong><strong> Sustainable Agriculture</strong> Coalition – August 29, 2011</span></p><p><strong><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=5SauPP9e8JdMjekKlagDS6FQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">New ERS Conservation Articles and Report</a><br
/> </strong></p><p>On Monday, August 22, USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) issued a new edition of its Amber Waves magazine, featuring two important agricultural conservation stories.</p><p>“Reducing Agriculture’s Nitrogen Footprint: Are New Policy Approaches Needed?” is a helpful quick review by Marc Ribaudo of earlier ERS publications on nutrient management and the array of possible policies to accelerate adoption, including financial assistance, compliance, and regulation. <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Z7IJD06iHj5VJNjKqEx1s6FQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p><p><strong><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=%2FVfXdU324ADoqG4sQ4%2B8maFQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Farmer Backlog for Federal Credit Addressed but Serious Gap Remains</a></strong></p><p>On July 28, USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) transferred unneeded Guaranteed Farm Operating Loan (GOL) funds to two credit programs with higher demand – Direct Farm Operating Loans (DOL) and Guaranteed Farm Ownership (GFO) loans.  FSA has general authority to transfer a portion of appropriated funds from one loan program to another to bring spending more in line with farmer demand for credit. <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=GYAFMZgIyNffXCfInnBlEaFQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a><strong></strong></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=ltGtp%2BwSOg828zbWnN0qe6FQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">USDA Proposes New Animal ID and Tracing Regulation</a></p><p>On Thursday, August 11, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) issued a proposed rule with national official identification and documentation requirements for the traceability of livestock moving interstate.  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=jb4XXO2tDSfFIR6qfdaMpKFQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a><strong></strong></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=BPjPaTOn4iipG%2FBPYTelLKVyquZyvb1n" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">2011 Conservation Innovation Grant Awards Announced</a></p><p>On Monday, August 22, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack announced the 2011 recipients of the Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG).  Approximately $22.5 million will be awarded to 52 non-profit, private and public organizations addressing natural resource concerns in 40 states across the country. <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=XUvxf7bo1jYapkLnilBZZKFQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a><strong></strong></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Vazq3LgGAs5oDJXc4hhid6FQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">New USDA Report Highlights Successes of the Wetlands Reserve Program</a></p><p>On Monday, August 22, USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) released a new publication highlighting the success of the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) over its 20-year history.  <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=fyhi97dC3C%2FkqOSRaHNLiqFQR6eb3Qlo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-update-august-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FDA&#8217;s New Food Safety Law &#8211; Agency Gives it a Positive Spin</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/fdas-newfood-safety-law-agency-gives-it-a-positive-spin/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/fdas-newfood-safety-law-agency-gives-it-a-positive-spin/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:42:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Agency Spin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[food safety law]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=13097</guid> <description><![CDATA[In a recent article from the FDA entitled The &#8216;Teeth&#8217; of FDA&#8217;s Food Safety Law, the agency puts a very positive spin on the law itself and it&#8217;s implementation. Because this is a controversial issue (to say the least), I&#8217;m sure that some of you will feel that I&#8217;m being wishy washy (at best) by [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
id="attachment_13098" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 205px"><a
href="http://www.beginningfarmers.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/FDA_Nogales_AZ_3640-Flickr-Photo-Sharing_1313493078713.png"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-13098" title="FDA_Nogales_AZ_3640 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!_1313493078713" src="http://www.beginningfarmers.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/FDA_Nogales_AZ_3640-Flickr-Photo-Sharing_1313493078713-195x300.png" alt="FDA Inspector Implements New Food Safety Law" width="195" height="300" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">An FDA Inspector in Arizona - Photo from FDA Flickr Photo Sharing</p></div><p><span
style="color: #800000;">In a recent article from the FDA entitled</span> <a
href="http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm267460.htm" target="_blank"><em>The &#8216;Teeth&#8217; of <strong>FDA&#8217;s Food Safety Law</strong></em></a><span
style="color: #800000;">, the<em><strong> agency</strong></em> puts a very <strong><em>positive spin</em></strong> on the law itself and it&#8217;s implementation.</span> Because this is a controversial issue (to say the least), I&#8217;m sure that some of you will feel that I&#8217;m being wishy washy (at best) by presenting the article without personal comment. But for those who don&#8217;t follow the <a
href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Beginning-Farmers/243201148446" target="_blank">Facebook page</a>, my policy is now to present the news, and (to the best of my ability) refrain from giving editorial comment on it. I find this inspires better dialog, and lets people form and express their own opinions, which is something I want to encourage. I know that for many of you, this article will make your blood boil. But please direct your opinions toward the issue, not toward me personally. I simply thought people should know what the FDA is saying about the new law. So here goes:</p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">EXCERPT:</span> The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), signed into law by President Obama in January, has been called “historic” because it puts the focus of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on prevention—working to ensure that unsafe foods are not distributed in the first place. FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg says the law directs the agency to oversee food safety in a way that applies “the best available science and good common sense to prevent the problems that can make people sick.” What lends the new law additional importance is that it provides FDA with new enforcement and inspection authorities. “These new authorities are critical for the law’s success,” said Michael R. Taylor, FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods. “They give the food companies strong additional incentives for keeping their products safe, and that helps us achieve the new law’s goal, which is to protect consumers from unsafe food.”</p><p>The full article is available at: <a
href="http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm267460.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm267460.htm</a> Please feel free to share your opinions using the comment link above, or on the <a
href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Beginning-Farmers/243201148446" target="_blank">Facebook page.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/fdas-newfood-safety-law-agency-gives-it-a-positive-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FARM NEWS from NATIONAL SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE COALITION</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-news-from-national-sustainable-agriculture-coalition/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-news-from-national-sustainable-agriculture-coalition/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 10:38:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11987</guid> <description><![CDATA[At the conclusion of the May 5 meeting at Blair House between Vice President Biden and six congressional leaders, all parties to the talks said progress had been made toward a deal that would lead both to a deficit reduction budget deal and a positive vote in Congress to raise the federal borrowing limit.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><span
style="color: #800000;">FARM NEWS from</span> <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" target="_blank">NATIONAL SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE COALITION</a></em><br
/> </strong></p><p><strong>Friday Update: Congress Returns with Budget Front and Center: </strong>At the conclusion of the May 5 meeting at Blair House between Vice President Biden and six congressional leaders, all parties to the talks said progress had been made toward a deal that would lead both to a deficit reduction budget deal and a positive vote in Congress to raise the federal borrowing limit. Beyond general platitudes, however, it was not clear to those outside the room just what exactly constituted progress other than they met and agreed to meet again next Tuesday. Republicans leaders insisted that discretionary and entitlement spending was on the table and tax expenditures off the table, while Democratic leaders insist that everything must be on the table. <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=3d%2FjAM5RDiWv2S9gqIJHKOTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong>Senate Bills Take Different Routes to Phase-Out Ethanol Tax Credit: </strong>This week saw the introduction of two Senate bills with different routes to phasing out the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=DM8S0F27qPgR1qkAX5DSTeTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit</a> (VEETC) for ethanol blended with gasoline and a tariff and ad valorem tax on imported ethanol, both of which are intended to stimulate ethanol production in the U.S.  Last December, Congress approved legislation that extended until December 31, 2011, the 45 cents per gallon VEETC, as well as the 54 cents per gallon tariff and ad valorem tax of 2.5 percent on imported ethanol. Opposition to the VEETC and ethanol tariff has intensified in 2011.  Those opposed to the VEETC represent a wide array of perspectives. <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=aGdeGHNsof9xETJx2FaY01UxtNJOArwN" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><strong>Results U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review Jury Award to Poultry Growers: </strong>On Monday, May 2, the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=em70%2F9ex9YS1uYIr59GlUeTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">U.S. Supreme Court declined</a>, without comment, a petition of certiorari to review a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Q29cJ%2BjqtvycdW9pU4%2BI8VUxtNJOArwN" target="_blank">10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision</a> in the case O.K. Industries v. Been.  The Appeals Court upheld a federal jury award of $14.5 million to poultry growers from a poultry processor because of the processor’s violations of Section 202(a) of the Packers &amp; Stockyards Act (PSA). PSA Section 202(a) provides that it is unlawful for live poultry dealers, packers or swine contractors to engage in or use any unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practice or device. <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=L1Rxkz1OpnsFuqTa76MogOTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong>Farm Service Agency Makes Good Choice for First BCAP Project: </strong>On Thursday, May 5, USDA Secretary Vilsack<a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=h%2Bi1XgsKDQLdv9O%2B8BLkmeTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank"> announced</a> that the first <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=i8KiEEK7WgrW5JyXKFU22uTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">Biomass Crop Assistance Program</a> (BCAP) project area would cover 30 counties in western Missouri and nine counties in Eastern Kansas, with biomass facilities operated by the Show Me Energy Cooperative as the biomass conversion facilities for the project.  About $15 million will be available for payments to farmers who participate in this first BCAP project. BCAP projects provide funding to farmers, ranchers, and nonindustrial forestland owners to establish and maintain bioenergy feedstocks specified in a BCAP project. <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=ICVXEy66zKEMxmJWwmPELeTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong>Food Desert Locator Tool Released: </strong>Following on previous efforts to make information available to the public using visual interfaces, USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) released the Food Desert Locator this week.  This new tool provides population characteristics of areas considered food deserts according the definition by the<a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=4miJMDAWpksWoLY%2F9pfgw%2BTTfE84tcVI" target="_blank"> Healthy Food Financing Initiative</a> (HFFI) Working Group. The HFFI, a partnership between the Treasury Department, Health and Human Services, and the Agriculture Department (USDA), with the collaboration of ERS staff, defines a food desert as a low-income census tract where a substantial number or share of residents has low access to a supermarket or large grocery store. <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=cC94FhSDFBXl%2FHSqEFhGtFUxtNJOArwN" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-news-from-national-sustainable-agriculture-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Agriculture Policy News, April 18-22, 2011</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-news-april-18-22-2011/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-news-april-18-22-2011/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:52:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atlantic Food Summit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Beachy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bioenergy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food Hub]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Leafy Green]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11903</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s installment of the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition&#8217;s Weekly News Roundup: CONGRESSIONAL NEWS Congressional Bioenergy Briefing: On On Tuesday, April 27, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute hosted a congressional briefing entitled Developing Sustainable Biomass Supplies.  Presentation slides and an audio recording of the briefing are posted on the Institute’s website. The briefing began with [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #800000;">Here is this week&#8217;s installment of the</span> <a
href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" target="_blank">National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition&#8217;s</a> <span
style="color: #800000;">Weekly News Roundup:</span></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><strong></strong><strong>CONGRESSIONAL NEWS</strong> </span></p><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=K51cgWBxshBlE9pt0RxGMiul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Congressional Bioenergy Briefing</a></strong>: On On  Tuesday, April 27, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute hosted a  congressional briefing entitled Developing Sustainable Biomass  Supplies.  Presentation slides and an audio recording of the briefing  are posted on the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=8We9eIZ2B1vsfiGoeaFBDyul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Institute’s website</a>. The briefing began with an overview and update  on implementation of the Farm Bill Energy Title programs administered by  the Rural Development Agency, as well as the Biomass Crop Assistance  Program overseen by the Farm Service Agency.  Then Dr. Jeffrey Steiner,  the National Program Leader for Biomass Production for the Agricultural  Research Service, discussed the challenges to achieving sustainable  biomass production.</p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>USDA NEWS</strong></span></p><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=xYIl57LhNEjdhydtpT%2BvxCul2WtULnon" target="_blank">NIFA Director Roger Beachy to Resign</a></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On  Friday, April 29, USDA announced that Roger Beachy, Director of the  National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), will leave his post  on May 20 of this year. USDA Undersecretary for Research, Education and  Economics, Cathie Woteki, announced Beachy’s resignation today in a<a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=spJNPLmUc8jxBqdkCjUGhCul2WtULnon" target="_blank"> memo to her staff</a>. Beachy intends to return to St. Louis.</p><p><em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=fbkPg%2FJMDY5zaSH9y5Nw8iul2WtULnon" target="_blank"></a></em></p><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=tUamokh1fU5YOBiJlGwBtCul2WtULnon" target="_blank">USDA Releases Assessment of Natural Resources in the United States</a></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On Wednesday, April 27, USDA released a pre-publication copy of  its long-awaited 2011 Resource Conservation Act Appraisal.  The  appraisal, part of USDA’s implementation of the Soil and Water Resources  Conservation Act (RCA), assesses the status of soil, water, and related  natural resources on non-Federal land and analyzes the effectiveness of  current conservation policies and programs. The RCA also directs USDA to develop a “national  conservation plan” in response to its Appraisal.  The plan is due to  Congress early next year and might also serve as a vehicle for  Administration ideas for the conservation title of the 2012 Farm Bill.<em> </em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=VcdTmPnKGO9eLxRlq%2B9sLSul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Results on Nationwide Analysis of Food Hubs Released</a></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On April 19, at the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=P087KImVBd9T0jS5SZ5E%2Biul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Making Good Food Work Conference</a> in Detroit, Michigan, Agriculture Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan released the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=RhWbQK2tdxW6OHAXg%2FXT1Cul2WtULnon" target="_blank">results</a> of  a nationwide analysis of food hubs.  Merrigan focused on the  economic  opportunities of food hubs, an emerging set of business models to  provide additional outlets for small and medium sized farmers and bring  local food to more consumers in a region. “Food hub” is a general term that encompasses a  variety of models.  Common features of food hubs are aggregation,   distribution, and marketing services for small and especially mid-sized  farms.<em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=PyfHAyc1Naa4Y7kqhrnVISul2WtULnon" target="_blank"></a></em></p><p><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Mp%2F3P7jFtRNqQidyfg5wlSul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Proposed National Leafy Green Marketing Agreement Released</a></strong>: On Tuesday, April 26,  USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=1D0gJHhDufUEibrjIJfNlyul2WtULnon" target="_blank">released</a> its <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=hcrrvOYjHt94oKuiNSJtpSul2WtULnon" target="_blank">proposal</a> for  a National Leafy Green Marketing Agreement (NLGMA).  If adopted, the   program would be used to govern the production, handling, and  manufacturing of leafy green vegetables, including spinach, lettuce, and  cabbage, for handlers who sign on and for all the farmers who supply  those participating handlers. Explaining  the vision for the proposed Agreement, AMS says NLGMA “would minimize  the potential for microbial contamination, thereby improving customer  confidence in leafy green vegetables in the marketplace.”  The Agency  adds that the Agreement “would be available to operations of all sizes,  locations, and agricultural practices.”<span
id="more-11903"></span><em> </em></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>EPA NEWS</strong></span></p><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=9anunjt6DjYTFKp6QV6lMCul2WtULnon" target="_blank">EPA and Army Corps Release New Guidance on Scope of Clean Water Act</a></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On Wednesday, April 27, the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers issued <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Aopa34xR%2FdbYl3lapsgdutienIozEyoe" target="_blank">a proposed guidance</a> for  determining which waters are protected under the Clean Water Act.  A  notice of the release of the proposed guidance will be published in the  Federal Register on May 2, which starts a 60-day public comment period  on the proposed guidance. Two  U.S. Supreme Court decisions over the last decade have engendered  uncertainty and controversy over the issue of the scope of the Clean  Water Act.  In the 2001 case <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=kAQfU6Gz%2FYPt6bjydJ5%2FaCul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Solid Waste Authority of Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of Engineers</a>,  the Court ruled that the Army Corps and EPA could not rely solely on  the use of a wetland area by birds as the jurisdictional support for  protecting a wetland isolated from other waters under the Clean Water  Act.</p><p><em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=ldLX9GONwzpo3T2KqqoJwiul2WtULnon" target="_blank"></a></em></p><p><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=GCKJRqyLse5%2B1AxGYKXKeyul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Challenge to EPA&#8217;s Renewable Fuel Standard Regulation</a></strong><strong></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On  April 18, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) filed a petition with  the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in a challenge  to <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=XLW2qohu5iuGbelznFEHxSul2WtULnon" target="_blank">EPA’s 2010 final regulation</a> for  changes to the renewable fuel standard program (also known as RFS2).   In 2010, NWF had petitioned EPA asking the agency to reconsider the  final regulation, a request which <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=vQXzaT84q%2B6o6C0qYsouFCul2WtULnon" target="_blank">EPA denied</a>. The  Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 mandates that under the  RFS2 up to 36 billion gallons of renewable biofuels be used by the  transportation sector in 2022.  The Act also imposes limits on the  greenhouse gases that can be emitted throughout the full lifecycle of  each type of biofuel specified in the Act.<em> </em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>OTHER NEWS</strong></span></p><p><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=qZ4Bj9Qr1e3cPv3DAbgk1yul2WtULnon" target="_blank">The Atlantic Holds Annual Food Summit in DC</a></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: Earlier this week The Atlantic held its annual <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=0KoM79SuY1ualaJezLLJ3iul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Food Summit</a> in  Washington, DC.  USDA Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan gave the  keynote address.  Merrigan started by acknowledging that it is an  exciting time for people working in the food and farm sectors since  Americans are increasingly interested in where their food comes from,  how it is produced, and who produces it. Merrigan  then spoke specifically about one of the Agency’s primary goals:  healthier children and improved child nutrition programs.  She referred  to the most recent <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=MiRNXVBxb2DFQsSPT1LXRiul2WtULnon" target="_blank">Child Nutrition Reauthorization</a> as  “landmark legislation,” which passed on December 2010.  Included in the  bill is $5 million per year in mandatory funding for farm to school  programs that NSAC and allied groups help secure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-news-april-18-22-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Agriculture Field Hearing on Farm Bill Rescheduled in Michigan</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-field-hearing-on-farm-bill-rescheduled-in-michigan/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-field-hearing-on-farm-bill-rescheduled-in-michigan/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Action]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming Practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming Resources]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Agriculture Field Hearing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rescheduled]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Roberts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stabenow]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11883</guid> <description><![CDATA[The following notice was sent from Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Chairwoman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. It announces the rescheduled date for the Agriculture Field Hearing on the Farm Bill to be held in Michigan with Ranking Minority Committee Member, Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS). If you have previously sent in [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #800000;">The following notice was sent from <strong>Senator Debbie Stabenow</strong> (D-MI), Chairwoman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. It <strong>announces the rescheduled date for the Agriculture Field Hearing on the Farm Bill to be held in Michigan with Ranking Minority Committee Member, Senator Pat Roberts</strong> (R-KS).</span></p><p
style="text-align: center;"><em><span
style="color: #ff0000;">If you have previously sent in comments or questions you don&#8217;t have to re-send them, Stabenow&#8217;s Committee Staff has informed me. But you <strong>do need to RSVP again</strong>. </span></em></p><p><span
style="color: #800000;">AGRICULTURE FIELD HEARING &#8211; RESCHEDULED</span></p><p>April 26, 2011</p><p>As the new Chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, I am writing to invite you to the first official field hearing on the upcoming reauthorization of our nation’s Farm Bill. Senator Pat Roberts from Kansas, who is the Ranking Member on the Committee, will be joining me for the hearing.</p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">Senate Agriculture Committee Field Hearing</span></p><p>Tuesday, May 31, 2011</p><p>9:00 am – 12:00 pm</p><p>Kellogg Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI</p><p><a
href="http://www.kelloggcenter.com/about/location.html" target="_blank">http://www.kelloggcenter.com/about/location.html</a></p><p>Congress considers the Farm Bill only once every five years. As you know, this legislation has broad implications for agriculture as well as sweeping impact on our energy, conservation, rural development, research, forestry and nutrition policies. This is your opportunity to make your voice heard and to be a part of the official record of committee debate.</p><p>You may participate in the hearing by submitting written testimony which will be included in the official record of the hearing. Three copies of your testimony can be submitted at the hearing or can be sent to the Committee no later than June 7, 2011. You may also submit questions for possible consideration by the panel members during a limited question and answer period before May 26, 2011. Send your testimony or questions to <a
href="mailto:aghearing@ag.senate.gov" target="_blank">aghearing@ag.senate.gov</a> or to US Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, 328A Russell Senate Office Bldg, Washington, D.C. 20510.  If you previously submitted testimony and questions, there is no need to resubmit.</p><p>For up-to-date information on the hearing and Farm Bill process, you can visit the Senate Agriculture Committee website at <a
href="http://ag.senate.gov/" target="_blank">ag.senate.gov</a>.</p><p>To RSVP for the hearing, contact the Agriculture Committee Office at 202-224-2035 or email <a
href="mailto:aghearing@ag.senate.gov" target="_blank">aghearing@ag.senate.gov</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-field-hearing-on-farm-bill-rescheduled-in-michigan/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>USDA Livestock Marketing Competition Rule Gets Broad Support</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-livestock-marketing-competition-rule-gets-broad-support/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-livestock-marketing-competition-rule-gets-broad-support/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:04:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Action]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ag Products]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming Practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Livestock]]></category> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Poultry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[GIPSA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rule]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Support]]></category> <category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11879</guid> <description><![CDATA[Despite a tepid response from the Senate Agriculture Committee, and actual hostility in the House, 141 agriculture organizations (see list below) signed a letter in support of USDA&#8217;s new livestock marketing competition rule (also known as GIPSA), and delivered it to legislators on Thursday, April 21st, 2011. The content of the letter is as follows: [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #800000;">Despite a tepid response from the Senate Agriculture Committee, and actual</span> <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/common/link.do?symbolicName=/ag/blogs/template1&amp;blogHandle=policy&amp;blogEntryId=8a82c0bc2eaec4d4012f8a7057b6099e&amp;showCommentsOverride=false" target="_blank">hostility in the House</a>, <span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>141 agriculture organizations </strong>(see list below)<strong> signed a letter in support of USDA&#8217;s new livestock marketing competition rule (also known as GIPSA), and delivered it to legislators</strong> on Thursday, April 21st, 2011. The content of the letter is as follows:</span></p><p>As a result of rapid consolidation and vertical integration, the livestock and poultry markets of this nation have reached a point where anti-competitive practices dominate, to the detriment of producers and consumers. Numerous economic studies in recent years have demonstrated the economic harm of current market structures and practices, and have called for greater enforcement of existing federal laws in order to restore competition to livestock and poultry markets.</p><p>Until recently, Congress and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have largely ignored these trends. Fortunately, Congress included language in the 2008 Farm Bill to require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to write regulations, using its existing Packers and Stockyards Act authorities, to begin to restore fairness and competition in livestock and poultry markets.</p><p>On June 22, 2010, the Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Agency (GIPSA) issued proposed rules to implement the 2008 Farm Bill mandates, and to address related anticompetitive practices in the livestock and poultry industries. These reforms are long overdue and begin to respond to the criticisms by farm groups, consumer groups, the Government Accountability Office and USDA’s Inspector General about USDA’s past lack of enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act. The proposed GIPSA rules define and clarify terms in the Act in order to make enforcement more effective, and to provide clarity to all players in livestock and poultry markets.<span
id="more-11879"></span></p><p>The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 makes it unlawful for packers, swine contractors, and live poultry dealers to engage in any “unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practice or device,” or to “make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person or locality in any respect, or subject any particular person or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect.” The ambiguity of these terms has resulted in uncertainty in the marketplace and hindered enforcement of the Act.</p><p>Key provisions of the proposed GIPSA rules would:</p><p>• Provide contract growers with commonsense protections when making expensive investments in facilities on their farms to meet the packer or poultry company requirements;</p><p>• Provide growers, farmers, and ranchers with access to the information necessary to make wise business decisions regarding their operations;</p><p>• Require transparency and eliminate deception in the way packers, swine contractor and poultry companies pay farmers;</p><p>• Eliminate collusion between packers in auction markets;</p><p>• Provide clarity about the types of industry practices the agency will consider to be unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or when certain practices give unreasonable preference or advantage. These are all terms used in the existing statute, which have never been adequately defined;</p><p>• Prohibit retaliation by packers, swine contractors or poultry companies against farmers for speaking about the problems within industry or joining with other farmers to voice their concerns and seek improvements. Currently, many farmers are often retaliated against economically for exercising these legal rights;</p><p>• Allow premiums to be paid to livestock producers who produce a premium product, but requires the packer or swine contractors to keep records to detail why they provide certain pricing and contract terms to certain producers;</p><p>• Reduce litigation in the industry by eliminating the ambiguity in interpretation of the terms of the Packers and Stockyards Act. Such ambiguity leads to litigation as farmers and packers seek court action to clarify the intent of the Act.</p><p>GIPSA has received approximately 60,000 comments on the proposed rule during the five-month public comment period that ended in November 22, of 2010. USDA is in the process of analyzing those comments, and providing the in-depth cost-benefit analysis necessary before issuing the final rule.</p><p>Because of the great importance of this rule to livestock and poultry producers and consumers, and the large volume of misinformation about the rule perpetuated by livestock and poultry trade associations and packer-producer groups, the undersigned organizations are writing to reiterate our strong support for the GIPSA rule and for its swift publication in final form.</p><p>We urge your support for the GIPSA rulemaking process, and its efforts to restore fairness and competition in our nation’s livestock and poultry markets.</p><p><span
style="color: #800000;">The letter was signed by the following organizations:</span></p><p>Agriculture and Land Based Training Association (CA)</p><p>Alabama Contract Poultry Growers Association</p><p>Alliance for a Sustainable Future (PA)</p><p>Alternative Energy Resources Organization (AERO) -MT</p><p>Ambler Environmental Advisory Council</p><p>American Agriculture Movement</p><p>American Corn Growers Association</p><p>American Federation of Government Employees (AFL-CIO), Local 3354, USDA-St.</p><p>Louis (representing Rural Development and Farm Loan employees in Missouri,</p><p>Oklahoma, and Kansas)</p><p>American Grassfed Association</p><p>American Raw Milk Producers Pricing Association</p><p>Ashtabula-Lake-Geauga County Farmers Union</p><p>BioRegional Strategies</p><p>Buckeye Quality Beef Association (Ohio)</p><p>C.A.S.A. del Llano (TX)</p><p>California Dairy Campaign</p><p>California Farmers Union</p><p>California Food &amp; Justice Coalition</p><p>Campaign for Contract Agriculture Reform</p><p>Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment</p><p>Carolina Farm Stewardship Association</p><p>Cattle Producers of Louisiana</p><p>Cattle Producers of Washington</p><p>Center for Celebration of Creation</p><p>Center for Food Safety</p><p>Center for Rural Affairs</p><p>Chemung County Church Women United (NY)</p><p>Chemung County Council of Churches (NY)</p><p>Chemung County Council of Women (NY)</p><p>Church Women United of Chemung County (NY)</p><p>Church Women United of New York State</p><p>Citizens for Sanity.Com, Inc.</p><p>Citizens for Sludge-Free Land</p><p>Colorado Independent CattleGrowers Association</p><p>Community Alliance for Global Justice</p><p>Community Farm Alliance (Kentucky)</p><p>Community Food Security Coalition</p><p>Contract Poultry Growers Association of the Virginias</p><p>Court St Joseph #139, Corning/Elmira, Catholic Daughters of the Americas, Corning, NY</p><p>Crawford Stewardship Project</p><p>Cumberland Counties for Peace &amp; Justice</p><p>Dakota Resource Council</p><p>Dakota Rural Action</p><p>Davidson College Office of Sustainability</p><p>Ecological Farming Association</p><p>Endangered Habitats League</p><p>Family Farm Defenders</p><p>Farm Aid</p><p>Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance</p><p>Farmworker Association of Florida</p><p>Fay-Penn Economic Development Council</p><p>Federation of Southern Cooperatives</p><p>Food &amp; Water Watch</p><p>Food Chain Workers Alliance</p><p>Food Democracy Now!</p><p>Food for Maine&#8217;s Future</p><p>Gardenshare: Healthy Farms, Healthy Food, Everybody Eats</p><p>Georgia Poultry Justice Alliance</p><p>Grassroots International</p><p>Heartland Center / Office of Peace and Justice for the Diocese of Gary, Indiana and the</p><p>Integrity of Creation</p><p>Hispanic Organizations Leadership Alliance</p><p>Idaho Rural Council</p><p>Illinois Stewardship Alliance</p><p>Independent Beef Association of North Dakota (I-BAND)</p><p>Independent Cattlemen of Nebraska</p><p>Independent Cattlemen of Wyoming</p><p>Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy</p><p>Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement</p><p>Iowa Farmers Union</p><p>Island Grown Initiative</p><p>Izaak Walton League</p><p>Kansas Cattlemen’s Association</p><p>Kansas Farmers Union</p><p>Kansas Rural Center</p><p>Ladies of Charity of Chemung County (NY)</p><p>Land Stewardship Project</p><p>Main Street Opportunity Lab</p><p>Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns</p><p>Michael Fields Agricultural Institute</p><p>Michigan Farmers Union</p><p>Michigan Land Trustees</p><p>Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance</p><p>Midwest Environmental Advocates</p><p>Midwest Organic Dairy Producers Association</p><p>Minnesota Farmers Union</p><p>Missionary Society of St. Columban</p><p>Mississippi Livestock Markets Association</p><p>Missouri Farmers Union</p><p>Missouri Rural Crisis Center</p><p>National Catholic Rural Life Conference</p><p>National Family Farm Coalition</p><p>National Farmers Organization</p><p>National Farmers Union</p><p>National Latino Farmers &amp; Ranchers Trade Association</p><p>National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition</p><p>Nebraska Farmers Union</p><p>Nebraska Sustainable Agriculture Society</p><p>Nebraska Wildlife Federation</p><p>Network for Environmental &amp; Economic Responsibility</p><p>New England Small Farm Institute</p><p>Nonviolent Economics</p><p>North Carolina Contract Poultry Growers Association</p><p>Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance</p><p>Northeast Organic Farming Association &#8211; NY</p><p>Northeast Organic Farming Association, Interstate Council</p><p>Northern Plains Resource Council</p><p>Northwest Atlantic Marine Alliance</p><p>Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Association</p><p>Ohio Environmental Stewardship Alliance</p><p>Ohio Farmers Union</p><p>Oregon Livestock Producers Association</p><p>Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility</p><p>Oregon Rural Action</p><p>Organic Consumers Association</p><p>Organic Farming Research Foundation</p><p>Organic Seed Alliance</p><p>Organization for Competitive Markets</p><p>Partnership for Earth Spirituality</p><p>Past Regents Club, Catholic Daughters of the Americas, Diocese of Rochester, NY</p><p>PCC Natural Markets</p><p>Pennsylvania Farmers Union</p><p>Pennypack Farm and Education Center (PA)</p><p>Pesticide Action Network North America</p><p>Pomona Grange #1, Chemung County NY</p><p>Powder River Basin Resource Council (WY)</p><p>R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America</p><p>Rocky Mountain Farmers Union</p><p>Rural Advancement Foundation International &#8211; USA (RAFI-USA)</p><p>Rural Coalition</p><p>Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia</p><p>Slow Food USA</p><p>South Dakota Livestock Auction Markets Association</p><p>South Dakota Stockgrowers Association</p><p>St John the Baptist Fraternity of the Secular Franciscan Order, Elmira, NY</p><p>Sustain LA</p><p>Taos County Economic Development Corporation</p><p>Texas Farmers Union</p><p>The Cornucopia Institute</p><p>Tilth Producers of Washington</p><p>Trappe Landing Farm &amp; Native Sanctuary</p><p>Veteran Grange #1118, Chemung County, NY</p><p>Virginia Association for Biological Farming</p><p>Western Organization of Resource Councils (WORC)</p><p>WhyHunger</p><p>Women, Food and Agriculture Network</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-livestock-marketing-competition-rule-gets-broad-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Agriculture Articles: Land Markets, Livestock Program, Succession</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-articles-land-markets-livestock-program-succession/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-articles-land-markets-livestock-program-succession/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:07:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming Resources]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Finding Land]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Livestock]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Succession]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category> <category><![CDATA[articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[land markets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[livestock program]]></category> <category><![CDATA[succession]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11788</guid> <description><![CDATA[The following are my recommended agriculture articles for Monday, April 25th, 2011 Peak Land Markets Don&#8217;t Deter Beginners (by Elizabeth Williams – DTN Progressive Farmer) EXCERPT: &#8220;Getting around that land barrier takes more patience than I first envisioned,&#8221; said Cannon, &#8220;because I don&#8217;t want to get land by being the highest rental bidder and undercutting [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em>The following are my recommended agriculture articles for Monday, April 25th, 2011 </em></span></p><p
style="text-align: center;"><strong><a
title="Peak Land Markets" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/common/link.do?symbolicName=/free/news/template1&amp;product=/ag/news/bestofdtnpf&amp;vendorReference=0353b2fa-34a2-481b-912d-1cb46058ad3a__1303130617556&amp;paneContentId=3030&amp;paneParentId=0" target="_blank">Peak Land Markets Don&#8217;t Deter Beginners</a></strong> <span
style="color: #800000;">(by Elizabeth Williams – DTN Progressive Farmer)</span></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">EXCERPT:</span> &#8220;Getting around that land barrier takes more patience than I first envisioned,&#8221; said Cannon, &#8220;because I don&#8217;t want to get land by being the highest rental bidder and undercutting the neighboring farmers. I don&#8217;t think that relationship is sustainable in the long run. If that&#8217;s all the landowner is looking for, who&#8217;s to say down the road, someone won&#8217;t come along and out bid me,&#8221; Cannon said. &#8220;I try to build a relationship with family friends, neighboring farmers and farm managers. I don&#8217;t want to come off as pushy.&#8221;</p><p
style="text-align: center;"><strong><a
title="Livestock Indemnity Program" href="http://www.agweb.com/article/livestock_indemnity_program_can_benefit_producers/" target="_blank">Livestock Indemnity Program Can Benefit Producers</a> </strong><span
style="color: #800000;">(by By Ellen Crawford &#8211; AgWeb)</span><em><br
/> </em></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">EXCERPT:</span> The federal Livestock Indemnity Program is available to provide payments to livestock producers who lose animals as a result of adverse weather conditions this year. “With flooding this spring, this program could be very helpful to producers,” says Oliver County, North Dakota Extension agent Rick Schmidt. “But the program is not limited to livestock losses from flooding. It also applies to losses from blizzards, wildfires, and extreme heat or cold.”</p><p
style="text-align: center;"><strong><a
title="Inside Job Legacy" href="http://links.mkt1447.com/servlet/MailView?ms=MzY1MjkxOTES1&amp;r=NzE3MDYwMDIyMwS2&amp;j=OTk1NzU1NzQS1&amp;mt=1&amp;rt=0" target="_blank">It’s an Inside Job!</a> </strong><span
style="color: #800000;">(By Kevin Spafford – Farm Journal Legacy Project)</span></p><p><strong> </strong><span
style="color: #ff0000;">EXCERPT:</span> Family farms are not destroyed by outside forces&#8212;the estate tax, government regulations or any other untoward burden&#8212;as often as they are left in ruin by a lack of communication and the natural self-interests of active and inactive family members. As a rule, most farmers are not good verbal communicators.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-articles-land-markets-livestock-program-succession/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Local Food Preference Rule for Child Nutrition Passed</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/local-food-preference-rule-for-child-nutrition-passed/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/local-food-preference-rule-for-child-nutrition-passed/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:48:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Adding Value]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ag Products]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm to School]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Local Food]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[child nutrition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food and Nutrition Service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[preference rule]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11778</guid> <description><![CDATA[A new rule passed by the Food and Nutrition Service now specifically allows local food to be preferentially purchased by public institutions including schools. The rule is referred to as the &#8220;Geographic Preference Option for the Procurement of Unprocessed Agricultural Products in Child Nutrition Programs&#8221; and it applies to any public institution which receives funding [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: left;"><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>A new rule passed by the Food and Nutrition Service now specifically allows local food to be preferentially purchased by public institutions including schools.</strong></span></p><p>The rule is referred to as the &#8220;Geographic Preference Option for the Procurement of Unprocessed Agricultural Products in Child Nutrition Programs&#8221; and it applies to any public institution which receives funding through the Child Nutrition Act &#8211; which is part of the 2008 Farm Bill. The rule which specifies that public institutions &#8220;may apply an optional geographic preference in the procurement of  unprocessed locally grown or locally raised agricultural products&#8221; clears the way for local food to be preferentially purchased by schools and other public institutions including state agencies.</p><p>Though this was happening in many places already, there were concerns that &#8220;farm to school&#8221; programs and other public entities were in conflict with rules regarding interstate trade and other provisions. If you are interested in learning more about the rule, reading the summary or text, you can check it out in the Federal Register at: <a
title="Local Food Rule" href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/04/22/2011-9843/geographic-preference-option-for-the-procurement-of-unprocessed-agricultural-products-in-child" target="_blank">http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/04/22/2011-9843/geographic-preference-option-for-the-procurement-of-unprocessed-agricultural-products-in-child</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/local-food-preference-rule-for-child-nutrition-passed/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Agriculture Policy Update, Week of April 18-22 2011</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-update-week-of-april-18-22-2011/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-update-week-of-april-18-22-2011/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:06:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming Resources]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[agriculture policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[April 2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[summary]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11774</guid> <description><![CDATA[Another busy week in Washington on agriculture policy means another long, but very informative summary of events from the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition PUBLIC COMMENT DEADLINE &#8211; Comments on the VAPG Interim Final Rule Due Monday: On February 23, the USDA released its interim final rule (IFR) for the Value-Added Producer Grant (VAPG) program.  The public [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>Another busy week in Washington on agriculture policy means another long, but very informative summary of events from the <a
href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" target="_blank"><span
style="color: #0000ff;">National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition</span></a></strong></span></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">PUBLIC COMMENT DEADLINE</span> &#8211; <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=%2F9iHEuMa4gfjLB4zjNav8lvHI%2FbxuFPm" target="_blank">Comments on the VAPG Interim Final Rule Due Monday</a>: On February 23, the USDA released its interim final rule (IFR) for the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=pJFEFuLqOX03zecvoYJr75%2B9%2BkK8P%2F3n">Value-Added Producer Grant</a> (VAPG) program.  The public comment period on the rule closes on Monday.  NSAC will submit its <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=A%2F60zkExKwj%2F55ve2x8XglvHI%2FbxuFPm" target="_blank">comments</a> then.  We encourage those interested in the program to read on for information regarding the contents of the interim final rule and, if so inclined, to submit comments on Monday. We also expect USDA to issue the notice that it will be accepting new VAPG grant proposals soon, perhaps as early as next week.  There is likely to be a 60 day turnaround time for submitting proposals.  We will let readers know as soon as the notice is made public.     <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=KTezbWfdjqzLLTMzwLIfvFvHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">CONGRESSIONAL NEWS</span></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=WxlzMNJDAnB8GNgZ%2B6Tiw1vHI%2FbxuFPm">NSAC Submits FY 2012 Appropriations Testimony to Congress</a>: On Thursday, April 14, NSAC submitted fiscal year (FY) 2012 appropriations testimony to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies.  The testimony includes NSAC funding requests for sustainable agriculture programs in FY 2012, and explains the importance of each program.  Click <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=tJdK9ypziCilhnggEkG%2FQVvHI%2FbxuFPm">here</a> to view a copy of the testimony.      <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=lzIkH7pDtYFG8R%2BgKdGTPlvHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=%2F2A578nmd2c0JSQwEVhcZ1vHI%2FbxuFPm">Letter to Congress in Support of Increased Fairness for Farmers and Ranchers</a>: This week, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition joined a total of 144 organizations from around the country on a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=n7Qg4fncO5H4G89Lc%2FMZ4lvHI%2FbxuFPm">letter</a> delivered to members of Congress urging them to support a fair competition <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=vdG3UyBkFDdzTVs5t%2FmnKFvHI%2FbxuFPm">rule proposed</a> by USDA’s Grain Inspection, Packers &amp; Stockyards Administration (GIPSA).  USDA issued the proposed rule in response to directives from Congress in the 2008 Farm Bill and to fulfill USDA’s duty to provide clear rules for implementing the Packers &amp; Stockyards Act. The proposed rule is intended to increase fairness to farmer and ranchers in the marketplace for poultry, hogs and cattle.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=mSIgKFSBgUVpq7YcgdDl91vHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">USDA NEWS</span></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=P%2FOiPiHT9a5dwXQAAdx7flvHI%2FbxuFPm">USDA Sets Deadline for Biomass Crop Assistance Program Project Proposals</a>: On April 19, USDA’s Farm Services Agency (FSA) issued a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=nK9YqkT29pPGEhgtU6EFGVvHI%2FbxuFPm">Notice</a> that the agency was setting a deadline for <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=mewlOK%2FcAFnFd31efViB3Z%2B9%2BkK8P%2F3n">Biomass Crop Assistance Program</a> (BCAP) project proposals.  Farmers participating in approved projects are eligible for payments to establish bioenergy crops as well as an annual payment. Project proposals must be submitted by May 27 to FSA state offices.  FSA state offices have until June 10 to review project proposals, which will then be sent to FSA’s national office for review and a determination if additional environmental review is needed for the proposed project.  FSA has until June 24 to make this determination.    <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=YBC55dPHqEfpITRm93QfA5%2B9%2BkK8P%2F3n">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=MTIxaX4dhOfvoU%2FBlbncxFvHI%2FbxuFPm">NSAC Submits Comment on Development of Guidelines to Measure GHGs and Carbon Sequestration</a>: On Tuesday, April 19, NSAC responded to a request for comments by USDA on its intent to develop technical guidelines and methods to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon sequestration for agricultural and forestry activities. The 2008 Farm Bill directed USDA to prepare technical guidelines that outline methods to measure the carbon benefits from conservation and land management activities.  USDA intends to develop measurement methods and guidelines for various types of producers and conservation and production practices.    <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=0acQT5LUBxn0HM9XYlmMKFvHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=ZIB77DjiL3%2FLvoNsYO7ZRFvHI%2FbxuFPm" target="_blank">Final Rule for Interstate Shipment of State-Inspected Meat and Poultry Announced</a>: On Tuesday, April 19, USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=fLGIf%2FzwMPeZJBI5iZIVp1vHI%2FbxuFPm">final rule</a> today to broaden the market for smaller, state-inspected meat and poultry plants.  As <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=NpyUEs77JHCtV1Atf70iMp%2B9%2BkK8P%2F3n">provided in the 2008 Farm Bill</a>, state-inspected establishments with 25 or fewer employees will be eligible to participate in a voluntary cooperative interstate shipment program, which will give them the option to ship meat and poultry products across state lines bearing an official USDA seal of inspection. FSIS  Administrator Al Almanza says of the rule, “Allowing these state-inspected establishments to ship their products across state lines has the potential to expand rural development and jobs,  increase local tax bases, strengthen rural communities, and ensure that food is safe for consumers.”   <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=zgoIFKvmuA3MTT4CxZEUT1vHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=BapoLwukiIwn%2FUx9yFdowVvHI%2FbxuFPm">Final Rule on Geographic Preference in Child Nutrition Programs Released</a>: Today the Food and Nutrition Service released the <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=wTTM009ESuSeDG%2BnemwPpFvHI%2FbxuFPm">final rule</a> on geographic preference in Child Nutrition Programs, demonstrating substantial progress for local and regional food systems. As the final rule explains, “geographic preference is a tool that gives bidders in a specified geographic area a specific, defined advantage in the procurement process.” This rulemaking follows from an amendment in the 2008 Farm Bill directing the Secretary of Agriculture to encourage local sourcing by institutions in the National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, and Department of Defense (DOD) Fresh program, among others.     <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=gpHNW2LXD3wK6129b8zRVlvHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=55%2FDSIFGUnZzMMRUEWZCa1vHI%2FbxuFPm">National Farmers Market Directory Open for Updates</a>: On Monday, April 18, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) opened the updating process for the <a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=cAT6vygnKWez1PDrEDr%2FjFvHI%2FbxuFPm">USDA National Farmers Market Directory</a>, which is the official count of farmers markets in the nation.  2011 will be the first year that the directory will track markets with multiple locations and days of operation. According to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, the directory is not merely a listing of the nation’s more than 6,100 farmers markets: it is also a resource for anyone interested in local food, small producers, and policy surrounding regional food systems.     <em><a
href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=BLR7%2FA2HACZmjKgVgAmz6lvHI%2FbxuFPm">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/agriculture-policy-update-week-of-april-18-22-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Farm Bill: What Does it Have to Do with Me?, Missouri Presentation</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-bill-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-me-missouri-presentation/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-bill-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-me-missouri-presentation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Local Food]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11729</guid> <description><![CDATA[Missourians are invited to help find answers to the question “What Does the Farm Bill Have to Do With Me?” at a public forum Tuesday, May 3, 2011. Federal legislation determining the nation’s farm and food priorities will be the focus of a panel discussion on “America’s Local Food Future” America&#8216;s Local Food Future Tuesday, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #993300;"><strong>Missourians are invited to help find answers to the question “What Does the Farm Bill Have to Do With Me?” at a public forum Tuesday, May 3, 2011.</strong></span></p><p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Federal legislation determining the nation’s farm and food priorities will be the focus of a panel discussion on “America’s Local Food Future”</em></span></p><p><strong>America</strong><strong>&#8216;s Local Food Future</strong></p><p><strong>Tuesday, May 3, 6:30 p.m.</strong></p><p><strong>Launer Auditorium</strong></p><p><strong>Columbia</strong><strong> College</strong></p><p><strong>901 Rogers   Street</strong><strong>, Columbia, MO 65216</strong></p><p>Save Your Seat. RSVP at <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://moenviron.org/foodfarm.asp" target="_blank">http://moenviron.org/foodfarm.asp</a>; or call 314-727-0600</p><p><strong>Join national &amp; local experts for a discussion of our food system, what it means to your budget, your health, &amp; how to change it</strong></p><p><strong>Speakers:</strong></p><p>·      Dave Andrews, Senior Representative for Food &amp; Water Watch, and former Executive Director of the National Catholic Rural Life Conference</p><p>·      Brad Redlin, Agricultural Program Director with the Izaak Walton League and Montana farmer</p><p>·      Bill Heffernen, PhD., Emeritus, University of Missouri Dept. of Rural Sociology</p><p>·      Tim Gibbons, Political Director, Missouri Rural Crisis Center</p><p><strong>Co-Sponsors</strong> – Izaak Walton League, Social Concerns Office Office-Diocese of Jefferson City, Missouri Association for Social Welfare, Missouri Coalition for the Environment, Missouri Rural Crisis Center, Slow Food KatyTrail, Sustain Mizzou, Main Street Opportunity Lab, Mid-Missouri Peaceworks, Missouri Association for Social Welfare</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/farm-bill-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-me-missouri-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Urban Agriculture Policy Plan Passes in Minneapolis</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/urban-agriculture-policy-plan-passes-in-minneapolis/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/urban-agriculture-policy-plan-passes-in-minneapolis/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:58:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Urban Farming and Gardening]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mineapolis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[passes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Urban agriculture plan]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11676</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Homegrown Minneapolis Urban Ag Policy Plan was passed by the Minneapolis City Council! The plan is rooted in a two+ year process with extensive community input and close collaboration with the Minneapolis Departments of Health and Community Planning and Economic Development and the Homegrown Minneapolis initiative. As Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak put it, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>The Homegrown Minneapolis Urban Ag Policy Plan was passed by the Minneapolis City Council!</strong></span></p><p>The  plan is rooted in a two+ year process with extensive community input  and close collaboration with the Minneapolis Departments of Health and  Community Planning and Economic Development and the Homegrown  Minneapolis initiative.</p><p>As  Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak put it, “This plan represents hundreds of  hours of work of volunteers and City staff, and it’s paid off.  The  plan makes it easier to be part of the local, healthy, sustainable food  movement and is a giant step toward helping our city and state move  closer to food independence.”</p><p>Efforts  here in Minneapolis were informed and inspired by the many communities  around the country who blazed the trail on urban ag.  Thanks for sharing  your sage advice and helping us make this a reality here in the  Heartland!</p><p>You can see the plan itself at:  <a
href="http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/dhfs/homegrown-home.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/dhfs/homegrown-home.asp</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/urban-agriculture-policy-plan-passes-in-minneapolis/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Sustainable Agriculture News and Policy Roundup, April 15, 2011</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-policy/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-policy/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:05:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation Programs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[April 2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[congressional budget]]></category> <category><![CDATA[EQIP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[farmers testify]]></category> <category><![CDATA[grants]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hearings]]></category> <category><![CDATA[policy roundup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture news]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11661</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a busy week in Washington for agriculture (among other things). To catch you up on the latest news and policy, here is the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition&#8217;s policy roundup. FARMERS IN D.C. Ohio Beginning Farmer Testifies at House Ag Credit Hearing: On Thursday, April 14, the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span
style="color: #ff0000;">It&#8217;s been a busy week in Washington for agriculture (among other things). To catch you up on the latest news and policy, here is the</span></em> <a
title="Sustainable Agriculture News and Policy" href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" target="_blank">National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition&#8217;s</a><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em> policy roundup.</em></span></p><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>FARMERS IN D.C.</strong></span></p><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=kcMQX0Q5hU9xR%2FK7CIjtxztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Ohio Beginning Farmer Testifies at House Ag Credit Hearing</a></strong>: On Thursday, April 14, the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, and Credit held a <a
title="hearing" rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=CQ%2FjcMwMNCSTGefpKAgx8ztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">hearing</a> to  review credit conditions in rural America.  The two panels primarily  featured witnesses from different credit providers, from independent  banks to federal loan providers. Among the witnesses was Matt Starline, a young farmer and owner of <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=U6X6uXAENl2OZe6N99%2BPpjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Starline Organics</a> in Athens, Ohio and a member of<a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=fFVgN84uyMYUL9OGXRmgBztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank"> Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Association</a>, an NSAC member group.                             <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Usxn9Tiiol5sOG3y%2Bo6GJyJP%2FSk%2BMQMJ" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=B5WtB2UnqnlOCm%2BW9CY9XDtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Guest Blog: Value-Added Producer Grants in Action</a></strong>: We  have delayed publishing an update on the fiscal year 2011  appropriations and fiscal year 2012 budget bills several times in the  past week due to a lack of detailed information emanating from Capitol  Hill.  Now, with the government shutdown averted just after midnight  last night, we understand (from the many emails received!) that readers  would like to know what happened on sustainable agriculture priorities.   Unfortunately there is not yet much to report with any degree of  assurance.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=QgG4nACdPEC2nuU18e95iTtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong> </strong><strong>CONGRESSIONAL NEWS</strong> </span></p><p><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=kI9tOUGpcQra1PtoNDGKfjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Congress Passes FY 2011 Budget, Cuts Billions From Agriculture</a></strong>: On Thursday, April 14, Congress passed a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=FJADfL2FvzFL5bc0xqD1ZSJP%2FSk%2BMQMJ" target="_blank">final 6-month continuing resolution</a> (CR)  that will fund the government through the end of the fiscal year.  The  CR cuts $42 billion relative to FY 2010 levels for non-defense spending,  but couples that with a $4 billion increase in defense spending, for a  net decrease of approximately $38 billion.  Of that $38 billion, $12  billion was already enacted via three preceding short-term continuing  resolutions over the past five weeks, including a $2 billion cut enacted  as late as April 8 in the form of a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=JbPULnn8AQ%2FhUTM7CfdtzTtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">one-week CR</a>.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=FhEi%2BlElRJV7l3TZTNNo%2BztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=OuUK66ecNNEUA7j%2FC2BEUztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Congress Releases Draft 6-Month Continuing Resolution</a></strong>: On  Wednesday, April 8, the Senate rejected four legislative riders that  would have limited EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions  under the Clean Air Act.  The riders were offered for attachment to a  small business bill. The  amendment offered by Senators Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and James Inhofe  (R-OK) came closest to passing by a vote of 50-50 but did not receive  the 60 votes required for passage of an amendment to the bill                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               . The  amendment would have prohibited EPA from promulgating any regulation  concerning, taking action relating to, or taking into consideration the  emission of a greenhouse gas (GHG) to address climate change.                            <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=H%2BxOQpDyRh4020Z6Xdo0vjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=kI9tOUGpcQr2IszDymUpPjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">What We Know and Don&#8217;t Know on the Budget</a></strong>: We  have delayed publishing an update on the fiscal year 2011  appropriations and fiscal year 2012 budget bills several times in the  past week due to a lack of detailed information emanating from Capitol  Hill.  Now, with the government shutdown averted just after midnight  last night, we understand (from the many emails received!) that readers  would like to know what happened on sustainable agriculture priorities.   Unfortunately there is not yet much to report with any degree of  assurance.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=XpDGtfMic4HSTfHxhTu3sztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;<span
id="more-11661"></span></a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=xO8QHpg5xcGnnGvY47rLqztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">House Hearing on the State of Poultry Industry</a>: </strong>On Wednesday, April 13, the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry of the House Agriculture Committee held a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=6yDjo7OvDBPDQnnGHW0LOJV6ZGgb9m91" target="_blank">hearing</a> on  the State of the Poultry Industry.  The three witnesses included a  Virginia poultry grower representing the Virginia Poultry Federation,  the chairman of an Iowa turkey processing company testifying on behalf  the National Turkey Federation, and the President of a Georgia chicken  processing company testifying on behalf of the National Chicken  Council. The  three major topics addressed at the hearing were the Grain Inspection,  Packers &amp; Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) proposed rule, the  impacts of corn ethanol production on the poultry feed prices, and the  EPA’s development of a Clean Water Act Total Daily Maximum Load (TMDL)  plan for the Chesapeake Bay region.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=STYVRkkrq2Y%2FoxAB0gxA2TtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=GrQdrnz3TfSGzoy%2Fa6osJDtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Senate Environment &amp; Public Works Committee Hearing on Renewable Fuels</a></strong>: On Wednesday, April 13, the Senate Environment &amp; Public Works Committee held a <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=9c2%2B1SF7ByI5MAN2Eg%2FeCztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">hearing</a> on  domestic renewable fuels, with a focus on corn ethanol.  Witnesses on  the first two panels included USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack and officials  from EPA and the Department of Energy who work on renewable fuel issues.   They were followed by a panel of supporters and a panel of critics of  the federal subsidies that are provided to corn ethanol.                            <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=LvvQp0yWrU6L%2BVf4MSCdVTtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>USDA NEWS</strong></span></p><p><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=OU85wuCdamrVC2A43rloZTtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">REAP Interim Final Rule and Notice of Funding Availability</a>: </strong>On Thursday, April 14, USDA issued an <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=wvNqv6LJw1r7eSIWrPwFjTtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Interim Final Rule (IFR)</a> for  the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) which is effective  immediately.  USDA is taking public comments on the IFR until June 13,  2011. NSAC  appreciated the IFR ranking priority for funding to small farms.  NSAC  also approves of the rule’s extending REAP funding to non-rural areas,  if the applicant for funding is an agricultural producer.  This  provision addresses some of NSAC’s concerns about REAP money going to  non-rural areas and could give a boost to local food initiatives in  those urban areas which can accommodate farming.  <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=vD2KBxAtUgFlj00rxYFQQDtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=sOswCypLs8YzqWwmeN8xaSJP%2FSk%2BMQMJ" target="_blank">FY 2010 AFRI Awards on Food Systems</a></strong>: Earlier  this year, USDA’s National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA)  posted the Fiscal Year 2010 awards for the Agriculture and Food Research  Initiative (AFRI).  Five of the six AFRI award categories focus on  integrated solutions to five “societal challenge areas”: Childhood  Obesity Prevention, Climate Change, Food Safety, Global Food Security,  and Sustainable Bioenergy. The Global Food Security challenge area includes  programs to address the availability and accessibility of food both  globally and in the US.  Within this challenge area, one of the  subprograms is “Improved Sustainable Food Systems to Reduce Hunger and  Food Insecurity Domestically and Globally.”                             <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=zRmfRMWaX%2FPaXAgJXfPqNDtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=UFjRkrHlAllRe0yNiEuZVztrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">National Agricultural Landscapes Forum in Review</a></strong>: On  Tuesday, April 5, Harris Sherman, USDA Undersecretary of Natural  Resources and Environment, and Dave White, Chief of the Natural  Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), testified before the House  Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and  Drug Administration and Related Agencies. The  hearing focused on the President’s fiscal year (FY) 2012 budget, which  proposes deep cuts to many agriculture conservation programs.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=Ye%2FssgqvKIeIU5yCyobsmjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=kcMQX0Q5hU%2FwBLF0uhvmfDtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">USDA Extends EQIP Organic Initiative Sign-up for FY 2011</a></strong>: On On  Tuesday, April 5, Harris Sherman, USDA Undersecretary of Natural  Resources and Environment, and Dave White, Chief of the Natural  Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), testified before the House  Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and  Drug Administration and Related Agencies. The  hearing focused on the President’s fiscal year (FY) 2012 budget, which  proposes deep cuts to many agriculture conservation programs. waterways.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=nvqYbOcsABeo2ipuFYS3HjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p><div><em> </em></div><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>OTHER NEWS</strong></span></p><p><strong></strong><strong><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=%2FMbLFSZ26yiVGF5OzOVEzjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">EWG Report Calls Soil Erosion &#8220;Far Worse than Official Estimates&#8221;</a></strong><strong></strong><strong> </strong>: On  Wednesday, April 13, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released a  new report on soil erosion in Iowa.  The report, entitled <em>Loosing Ground</em>,  states that soil in Iowa and other Corn Belt states is “being swept  away at rates many times higher than official estimates.”  The findings  are based in part on data from aerial surveys and Iowa State University  (ISU). According to the report, the National Resources  Inventory (NRI) data that are typically used by USDA suggest that  erosion rates in Iowa averaged 5.2 tons per acre per year, and 3.9  across the entire Corn Belt in 2007.   <em><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=fElL3AdG1%2BqPhKdVj7A%2FkjtrqE7KfrNG" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></em></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-agriculture-news-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Sustainable Food and Land Policy Courses Online, Summer 2011</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-food-landy-courses-onine-summer-2011/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-food-landy-courses-onine-summer-2011/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:43:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Education]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet Resources]]></category> <category><![CDATA[learning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[courses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[land policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[online]]></category> <category><![CDATA[summer 2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sustainable food]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11655</guid> <description><![CDATA[The following courses are being taught online this summer through the University of Massachusetts: PLSOILIN 185 – Sustainable Living (4 credits -  online only) GenEd (I);  introduces you to diverse global perspectives and practical personal solutions related to environmental, economic and social sustainability. Taught by Katie Campbell-Nelson and John Gerber.  Click here for more information. [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">The following courses are being taught online this summer through the University of Massachusetts:</span></p><p><em><strong>PLSOILIN 185 – <span
style="color: #800000;">Sustainable Living</span></strong></em> (4 credits -  online only) GenEd (I);  introduces you to diverse global perspectives and practical personal solutions related to environmental, economic and social sustainability. Taught by Katie Campbell-Nelson and John Gerber.  <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.justfoodnow.org/sustliving.htm" target="_blank">Click here for more information.</a></p><p><strong><em>PLSOILIN 290C – <span
style="color: #800000;">Land Use Policies and Agriculture in the U.S.</span></em></strong><span
style="color: #000000;"> (3 credits -  online only); provides students with an opportunity to explore the political, economic and societal forces that influence land use decisions, an understanding of the history of land use policies and planning in the U.S. as they relate to agriculture. Taught by Robert Wagner, Senior Policy Analyst for American Farmland Trust. </span><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.justfoodnow.org/farmland.htm" target="_blank"><span
style="color: #0000ff;">Click here for more information.</span></a></p><p><em><strong>PLSOILIN 397C – <span
style="color: #800000;">Community Food Systems</span></strong></em><span
style="color: #000000;"> (3 credits – mostly online, with one Saturday field trip); examines the movement of food from seed to table. Participants in the course explore local and global food systems, and specific food related issues that impact health of communities.  Taught by Catherine Sands, Director of Fertile Ground. </span><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.justfoodnow.org/commfoodsystems.htm" target="_blank">Click here for more information.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/sustainable-food-landy-courses-onine-summer-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Organic Certification Cost Share Reimbursements</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/organic-certification-cost-share-reimbursements/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/organic-certification-cost-share-reimbursements/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:33:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cost share]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National Organic Program]]></category> <category><![CDATA[organic certification]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reimbursements]]></category> <category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11640</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks to Betsy Rakola; Grants Management Specialist, USDA-AMS National Organic Program for putting together this information for us. The USDA National Organic Program (NOP) administers a cost-share program to help certified organic farmers, ranchers, processors, and handlers pay for the cost of certification. If you have a current USDA organic certification, then you may be [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Thanks to Betsy Rakola; Grants Management Specialist, USDA-AMS National Organic Program for putting together this information for us.</em></span></p><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>The USDA National Organic Program (NOP) administers a cost-share program to help certified organic farmers, ranchers, processors, and handlers pay for the cost of certification.</strong></span> If you have a current USDA organic certification, then you may be reimbursed for up to 75% of your costs for certification, such as inspection fees, application fees, and gross sales assessments/user fees. The annual maximum is $750 per certification. This is a great opportunity for organic operators to offset the cost of certification.</p><p>This program is <em>not</em> competitive, and money is available in all participating states. Applications are processed on a first-come, first-served basis until the money runs out. During the last two years, less than half of all certified producers and handlers applied to participate. If your operation is certified as USDA organic, then you may take advantage of this easy way to reduce your certification expenses.</p><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>How To Apply</strong></span></p><p>1.      Contact your state’s Department of Agriculture (or its equivalent) for an application.</p><p>Contact names for each state are available online at <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/NOPCostShareProgramParticipants">www.ams.usda.gov/NOPCostShareProgramParticipants</a>. Some states have application forms available for download, and these links are also available on the USDA website. If you don’t have access to the internet, then you can either call your certifier or your state Department of Agriculture to get an application. Note: At the time of writing, all states except Utah offered a cost share program.</p><p>2. Assemble your supporting documentation. You will need to show proof of your certification and the expenses you have already paid. <strong>Save your invoices, statements, and receipts – they may be required as proof of payment.</strong> The following documents are typically requested by State departments of agriculture, but make sure to review your state’s requirements carefully – it is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete.</p><ul><li>Proof of USDA organic certification (a copy of your certificate)</li><li>Itemized invoice showing expenses paid for certification</li><li>W-9 tax form</li></ul><p>Most certification-related expenses are eligible for reimbursement. However, keep in mind that items such as late fees, inspections due to noncompliance, and inspections for certifications other than USDA Organic (such as JAS or Bird Friendly) are not eligible for reimbursement under this program. You may receive one reimbursement per year for a new certification or a renewal of certification, provided that the annual maximum reimbursement does not exceed $750 per certificate.</p><p>Still have questions? Contact Betsy Rakola, the USDA National Organic Program’s cost share manager at 202-720-3252 or <a
rel="nofollow" href="mailto:Betsy.Rakola@ams.usda.gov">Betsy.Rakola@ams.usda.gov</a>. Or, visit the cost share webpage at <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ams.usda.gov/NOPCostSharing">www.ams.usda.gov/NOPCostSharing</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/organic-certification-cost-share-reimbursements/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How will the New Budget Deal Affect Agriculture?</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/how-will-the-new-budget-deal-affect-agriculture/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/how-will-the-new-budget-deal-affect-agriculture/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:57:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Ag. Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation Programs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[$42 billion cut]]></category> <category><![CDATA[agricuture]]></category> <category><![CDATA[budget deal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[we don't know]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11567</guid> <description><![CDATA[Basically we know very little at this point. But if you want to know more about how government works or how budgets affect agricultural programs, this post from the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition is a fantastic reference. I learned a lot from reading it &#8211; especially about what we don&#8217;t know and why! We have [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Basically we know very little at this point. But if you want to know more about how government works or how budgets affect agricultural programs, this post from the </em></span><a
rel="nofollow" href="http://sustainableagriculture.net" target="_blank">National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition</a> <span
style="color: #ff0000;"><em>is a fantastic reference</em></span>. <span
style="color: #800080;">I learned a lot from reading it &#8211; especially about what we don&#8217;t know and why!</span></p><p>We have delayed publishing an update on the fiscal year 2011  appropriations and fiscal year 2012 budget bills several times in the  past week due to a lack of detailed information emanating from Capitol  Hill.  Now, with the government shutdown averted just after midnight  last night, we understand (from the many emails received!) that readers  would like to know what happened on sustainable agriculture priorities.   Unfortunately there is not yet much to report with any degree of  assurance.</p><p><em><strong>Fiscal Year 2011 Bill</strong></em></p><p>We will likely not be able to provide details on the 2011  appropriations bill until late Monday after the bill is (hopefully) made  public.  Appropriations staff on Capitol Hill are busy this weekend  working on the details of the package announced last night.</p><p><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>From press accounts, the basics of the deal are a $42 billion cut  below FY 2010 levels for non-defense spending coupled with a $4 billion  increase in defense spending, for a net decrease of approximately $38  billion</strong></span>.  Of that $38 billion, $10 billion was already enacted via the  two preceding short term Continuing Resolutions over the past five weeks  and $2 billion more was enacted last night in the form of a new  one-week Continuing Resolution.</p><p>No USDA programs were included in the new $2 billion in cuts; those  cuts were focused on Transportation and Housing and Urban Development.</p><p>Agriculture and rural development were already subject to  disproportionately high cutbacks in the earlier two short-term  Continuing Resolutions.</p><p>The new Continuing Resolution passed last night expires next Friday,  April 15, at the same time that many people will be racing to the Post  Office with their last minute tax return filings.  The rest-of-FY 2011  appropriations bill is being drafted now.  It will be made public soon,  presumably on Monday.  The House will vote on the bill first.  By House  rules, the bill will need to sit for three days before it can be voted  on, presumably on Thursday.  The Senate will vote later on Thursday or  on Friday.</p><p>Two issues have been particularly contentious over the last several  weeks.  First, there has been significant disagreement over the issue of  whether the final measure will include cuts to mandatory spending  programs in addition to discretionary spending, which is the normal  focus of appropriations bills.  (Cuts to mandatory programs, such as  Social Security, food stamps, or farm subsidies, are known in Hill-speak  as “CHIMPS” (changes in mandatory program spending)).  Second,  it has  been uncertain whether the bill would legislate as well as appropriate  via provisions known as legislative “riders.”</p><p>According to press accounts, the final bill does include substantial  CHIMPS, as favored by Senate Democrats and the White House.  Nearly $18  billion of the $42 billion in non-defense cuts are reported to be from  mandatory spending.  Or to put it another way, of the $30 billion  remaining to be cut beyond the reductions already made in the short-term  Continuing Resolutions, 60 percent will come from mandatory programs.<span
id="more-11567"></span></p><p>Among the CHIMPS in the bill are $3.5 billion from unspent Children’s  Health Insurance Program,  $2.2 billion from the $6 billion in the  health care law for co-op health plans, $2.5 billion in unexpended  highway funding, and immediate as well as long term savings to Pell  grants.  We do not yet know if the CHIMPS include cuts to the  conservation, energy, or other Farm Bill titles.</p><p>On the legislative rider front, all of the measures past earlier by  the House to curtail the authority of the EPA were excluded from the  final deal.</p><p>A key issue in the final negotiations was whether to include  restrictions on family planning and abortion programs in the bill.  The  anti-Planned Parenthood and related riders were kept out of the final  deal on the basis of a promise of a stand-alone vote on the issue later  this year.</p><p>The District of Columbia was the big loser in the “rider” war.  The  DC government is now prevented from spending its own tax receipts on  abortion services for low-income women.  In addition, as championed by  House Speaker John Boehner, the District must now provide vouchers to  low-income children to attend religious or private schools instead of  public schools.</p><p><em><strong>House FY 2012 Budget Resolution</strong></em></p><p>While all the activity on the FY 2011 appropriations bill was going  on this week, the House Republicans also introduced and passed their  budget resolution for FY 2012.  In the coming weeks, we will be covering  that resolution in more detail, as well as the one expected to be  released soon by Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND), chair of the Senate Budget  Committee.</p><p>We can say two things about the House resolution with assurance.</p><p>First, the House resolution suggests a $30 billion reduction in farm  commodity and crop insurance subsidies over the course of the next ten  years, but it postpones the reduction until after Congress has time to  work on the 2012 Farm Bill.</p><p>If the $3 billion a year reduction were to be made with $2 billion  from commodity production support and $1 billion from crop insurance, it  would likely reduce direct payments to corn, soy, wheat, cotton and  rice producers and landowners by 40 percent.</p><p>Second, the House resolution calls for a $18 billion reduction, over  ten years, in environmental and natural resource spending.  These  reductions will affect farm bill conservation spending as well as  funding for EPA, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service,  Forest Service, Army Corps of Engineers, and other government natural  resource agencies.</p><p>How much if any of that $18 billion is assumed to come from farm bill  conservation spending or discretionary spending for conservation  technical assistance at USDA is unknown at this time.</p><p>The budget resolution, once it is finalized, controls the spending  limits that appropriations bills must abide by.  The House resolution  assumes increasingly tighter limits on discretionary spending.</p><p>With respect to mandatory spending, budget resolutions can mandate a  “budget reconciliation” process in which authorizing committees, such as  the Agriculture Committee, must come up with legislation to scale back  spending to the numbers in the resolution.  Strangely, however, the  House budget resolution does not call for budget reconciliation, even  while calling attention to items such as the suggested $30 billion cut  in farm program spending and other large reductions in mandatory  spending.</p><p>With respect to the nutrition program part of the farm bill, the  House resolution assumes a radical change in the SNAP or food stamp  program, transforming it from a federal entitlement program to a state  block grant program that would reduce overall food stamp spending.   Similar proposals were attempted during the 1980s and 1990s, but both  times were turned back by an alliance of farm, agribusiness, and  anti-hunger groups.</p><p>Whatever the outcome of the congressional budget resolution process  this year, it is important to remember that the budget resolution can  assign a mandatory spending budget reduction number to an authorizing  committee such as the Agriculture Committee, but then it is entirely up  to the authorizing committee as to where and how to make the required  cuts.  Assumptions undergirding the budget resolution are just that,  assumptions, that do not need to be followed.</p><p>We will continue to report on the FY 2012 budget and appropriations process over the course of the coming months.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/how-will-the-new-budget-deal-affect-agriculture/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>USDA Announces People&#8217;s Garden School Pilot Program to Promote Garden-Based Learning Opportunities</title><link>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-announces-peoples-garden-school-pilot-program-to-promote-garden-based-learning-opportunities/</link> <comments>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-announces-peoples-garden-school-pilot-program-to-promote-garden-based-learning-opportunities/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:26:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Community Development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gardening]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Health]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Local Food]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Youth]]></category> <category><![CDATA[communities]]></category> <category><![CDATA[healthy children]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[People's Garden]]></category> <category><![CDATA[safe]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beginningfarmers.org/?p=11563</guid> <description><![CDATA[USDA Press Release No. 0155.11;C ontact: FNS Office of Communications, 703-305-2281 &#160; People&#8217;s Gardens Aim to Provide Nutritious, Safe and Healthier Choices for Children and Communities WASHINGTON, April 7, 2011 — Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced today that Washington State University will develop and run the People&#8217;s Garden School Pilot Program which will serve an [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
style="color: #ff0000;">USDA Press Release No. 0155.11;C ontact: FNS Office of Communications, 703-305-2281</span></p><p
style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p><p
style="text-align: center;"><span
style="color: #800000;"><strong>People&#8217;s Gardens Aim to Provide Nutritious, Safe and Healthier Choices for Children and Communities</strong></span></p><p>WASHINGTON, April 7, 2011 — Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced today that Washington State University will develop and run the People&#8217;s Garden School Pilot Program which will serve an estimated 2,800 students attending 70 elementary schools in Washington, New York, Iowa and Arkansas. The Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth pilot is an innovative strategy to help our nation win the future through improved K-12 education. It explores the impact of school gardens on learning and on changing student consumption patterns so they make healthier food choices.&#8221;School gardens hold great promise for educating our kids about food production and nutrition,&#8221; said Vilsack. &#8220;Learning where food comes from and what fresh food tastes like, and the pride of growing and serving your own fruits and vegetables, are life-changing experiences. Engaging kids in our efforts to end childhood hunger and curb childhood obesity is critical if we are going to succeed.&#8221;<span
id="more-11563"></span></p><p>The $1 million pilot program is authorized under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. The schools selected to participate in this pilot come from urban, suburban, and rural communities and have at least 50 percent of their students qualified to receive free or reduced-price school meals The initiative is part of a the USDA People&#8217;s Garden Initiative which establishes community and school gardens across the nation to help unite neighborhoods in a common effort and inspire simple solutions to challenges facing our country – from hunger to the environment. The announcement comes as First Lady Michelle Obama&#8217;s <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&amp;enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPTEwMzU0OTEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPVBSRC1CVUwtMTAzNTQ5MSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTEyNzY2NDM0ODcmZW1haWxpZD1yZWdhbi5ob3BwZXJAZm5zLnVzZGEuZ292JnVzZXJpZD1yZWdhbi5ob3BwZXJAZm5zLnVzZGEuZ292JmZsPSZleHRyYT1NdWx0aXZhcmlhdGVJZD0mJiY=&amp;&amp;&amp;102&amp;&amp;&amp;http://www.letsmove.gov/" target="_blank">Let&#8217;s Move!</a> initiative celebrates National Gardening Month (April).</p><p>&#8220;Washington State University is a leader when it comes to gardening and garden-based learning, and this important pilot program will make a significant contribution to the development of national models,&#8221; said Kevin Concannon, USDA Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services. &#8220;This program moves us toward our goal of improving the health and nutrition of our kids and communities, and instilling healthy eating habits that can last a lifetime.&#8221;</p><p>USDA&#8217;s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) oversees the administration of 15 nutrition assistance programs that touch the lives of one in four Americans over the course of a year. Visit <a
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fns.usda.gov" target="_blank">www.fns.usda.gov</a> for information about FNS and nutrition assistance programs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.beginningfarmers.org/usda-announces-peoples-garden-school-pilot-program-to-promote-garden-based-learning-opportunities/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/86 queries in 0.226 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1170/1462 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.beginningfarmers.org @ 2012-02-04 00:19:02 -->
