USDA Issues Final Rule for Conservation Stewardship Program

USDA Press Release No. 0301.10 Contact: Office of Communications 202-720-4623 Changes expand access, increase payment limits, and promote greater environmental benefit while maintaining program goals WASHINGTON, June 3, 2010 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced that USDA published the final regulations governing the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Authorized in the 2008 Farm Bill, CSP is a voluntary program that offers payments to producers who exercise good land stewardship and want to improve their conservation performance. "Voluntary conservation practices by private landowners and producers are an essential part of our effort to improve soil and water quality," said Vilsack. "Broad and diverse participation in the CSP program will provide producers with many benefits such as enhancing wildlife habitat and helping to mitigate the impact of climate change." Vilsack also announced that the enrollment period for CSP's second year, which is currently open, has been extended an additional two weeks, now closing June 25, 2010. Administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), CSP is available to all producers regardless of operation size, crops produced, or geographic location. Eligible lands include cropland, pastureland, rangeland, non-industrial private forest land, and agricultural land under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe. Under the final rule published today and effective immediately, the program retains the broad features outlined in the interim final rule, including: * CSP pays participants for conservation performance – the higher the performance, the higher the payment. * Producers get credit both for conservation measures they have already implemented and for new measures they agree to add. * CSP is offered in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Pacific and Caribbean areas through continuous sign-up, with announced cut-off dates for ranking and funding applications.

The experience gained during the program’s first year, and comments received from partners and the public during the 90-day public comment period, have contributed to a number of important changes in the program rules. The program’s new features include the following:

* Higher payment rate for additional conservation performance. USDA is implementing a split payment structure, with one payment rate for existing conservation activities and a higher payment rate for new activities. This is expected to encourage producers to apply more new activities and thereby generate greater environmental benefits.

* Higher payment limit. The total contract limitation for joint operations is increased from $200,000 to $400,000, with annual payment limits increased from $40,000 to $80,000 to fairly compensate joint operations that produce environmental benefit levels needed to earn the payments.

* New minimum payment. To directly encourage participation by small-scale, historically underserved producers, the rule establishes a minimum payment of $1,000.

* Pastured cropland. “Pastured cropland” is added as a new designation with a higher payment than “pastureland” because of the greater income foregone by producers who maintain a grass-based livestock production system on land suitable for cropping.

* Enhancements. Some conservation enhancements work better when implemented as a system and under the new rule are offered as enhancement “bundles.” Participants who implement such comprehensive bundles get higher rankings and higher payments.

* Resource-conserving crop rotation. In response to extensive public comment, the definition of “resource-conserving crop rotation” is revised to require the use of grass and/or legumes. Since resource-conserving crops receive supplemental payments under CSP, the rule change ensures that the crops provide a sufficient level of environmental benefit.

Other changes in the regulation give producers greater flexibility in establishing their eligibility to apply for CSP and in certifying their control of the land.

Potential applicants are encouraged to use the CSP self-screening checklist to determine whether CSP is suitable for their operation and apply prior to the closing date of June 25, 2010, when applications will be scored, ranked, and funded. The checklist, which highlights basic information about CSP eligibility requirements, contract obligations, and payments, and additional information about CSP, may be obtained from the national CSP Web site ( or individual state NRCS offices (

USDA published the CSP interim final rule on July 29, 2009, and solicited comment through October 28, 2009. Initially scheduled to end on September 28, 2009, the comment period was extended to encourage comments throughout the program’s first enrollment period. NRCS received 1,534 comments and reviewed and considered each one. Responses to the comments are incorporated in the final rule released today. The final rule can be viewed at:

NRCS is celebrating 75 years of helping people help the land in 2010. Since 1935, the NRCS conservation delivery system has advanced a unique partnership with state and local governments and private landowners delivering conservation based on specific, local conservation needs, while accommodating state and national interests.

2 Comments on USDA Issues Final Rule for Conservation Stewardship Program

  1. I, along with many other American Indian individuals and tribes would like to see the following animals removed from the Exhotic Animal List:

    Deer, Antelope, Buffalo, Bison.

    I don’t believe that an additonal USDA inspection or subsequent stamp is necessary for animals that could just as easily be inspected under the same practices as used for beef, lamb chicken, ect. The above listed animals were native to North America before the coming of Europeans. Lifting the added burden of additional inspections would allow the growth of small ranchers of these animals to be sold on the common market; both on and off the reservation.

    • Karen,
      I’m afraid this particular issue isn’t one I know that much about.

      I’m not a big fan of government regulations that overburden small farmers personally. But I do wonder if the extra scrutiny might be related to a concern that raising these animals in confinement, the way we often raise beef, swine, poultry, etc. could increase the risk of diseases incidence (as it does with these animals when kept in large intensive confinement feeding operations) and that such disease might spread to wild populations that we want to protect. This is an issue that doesn’t apply to cows in the same way since there aren’t any native wild cow populations to protect. This is only speculation on my part.

      And in general I agree that the government often oversteps in terms of regulations and inspections, especially for small operations and those that don’t practice intensive confinement and feeding, though this is simply my personal opinion.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.